CEO DOSSIER
Facing up to Russian oligarchs and fleeing Russia, fronting the explanations for the largest accidental marine oil spill in history and then being appointed to save BP from bankruptcy in one of history’s great corporate firesales, Bob Dudley knows what “pressure” can feel like. Can he now set BP on the path to profitable innovation and sustainable growth?
early years
Bob Dudley is the first American CEO of oil giant BP; appointed to restore confidence after the blowout in 2010 of a well that killed 11 rig workers and spewed several million barrels of crude oil into the Gulf of Mexico.
Bob has focused on making BP “smaller,” “safer” and “more agile,” on increasing its business and regaining investors’ trust. Conceding that “we nearly lost the company” in the wake of the crisis, Bob now claims that, with a high oil price, asset disposals and a more focused business, BP has “turned the corner”. Under Bob, BP has resumed dividends and returned to profitability, making $23.9bn for the 2011 full year compared with a $4.9bn loss in 2010. He does however concede that multi-billion dollar legal case into the Deepwater Horizon rig disaster is set to last until 2014, and many analysts expect that fines could exceed the $40bn it has provisioned for.
Bob’s early years certainly gave him an understanding of the disaster-hit area of the southern USA, as he grew up in Mississippi and spent summers fishing and swimming on the Gulf. He got a degree in chemical engineering from the University of Illinois before completing a masters a the Thunderbird School of Global Management and an MBA from Southern Methodist University. He joined Amoco in 1979, which subsequently became part of BP in 1998. Bob worked in a variety of positions at Amoco, negotiated deals in the South China Sea and worked in Moscow from 1994-7, becoming general manager for strategy.
A difficult period in Bob’s career was from 2003-8, when he was president of TNK-BP, a joint venture between BP and a group of Russian oligarchs known as AAR. While there was commercial success - TNK-BP increased its oil production by a quarter, increased its reserves by 38% a year and provided the highest average shareholder return of any major Russian company – there were diplomatic problems. The Russian oligarchs from AAR accused him of favouring BP in the joint venture – Bob complained that his staff had visa problems and were being harassed and intimidated. When his own visa was not renewed in June 2008, Bob left Russia in haste; for seven months he attempted to run TNK-BP from an undisclosed secret location, but BP subsequently lost control of the business. Wikileaks later revealed that Bob strongly suspected Igor Sechin, Russia’s deputy prime minister and chairman of the state-owned energy company, Rosneft, for organizing a boardroom coup that led him to feel that his life was under threat, although the two are now working together again in a new deal with Rosneft.
With a remit to focus instead on activities in the Americas and Asia, Bob became a managing director of BP in 2009, promoted to President and CEO of BP's Gulf Coast Restoration Organization in June 2010. Tony Hayward, the British CEO who had struggled to respond to the Mexican Gulf crisis, described Bob as “the management team's Foreign Secretary – or perhaps Secretary of State in American terms.” Bob’s admission that “what I saw was painful and emotional, and shocking” and that BP had “failed to wrestle the beast” was cautiously welcomed by the US media. The Christian Science Monitor noted that he “appears to choose his words more carefully” than Tony, whom Bob succeeded in the top job in October 2010.
As ceo
Bob has since worked to repair BP’s reputation in the USA, where BP has about a third of its business interests and 40% of its shareholders and employees. While BP’s safety record has been his priority, Bob has also aimed to double its exploration spending by investing in projects in developing economies like Brazil, Libya and Jordan. Bob claims that BP has changed its procedures since the accident, and that, “I think we are now using the toughest standards in the world for floating drilling rigs everywhere.”
“We quickly did a group of disposals to get us in a better position,” says Bob, who is now relieved that a deal to sell BP’s $7.1bn stake in Pan American Energy in Argentina, which has since made prime shale discoveries, failed to go through. He has restructured operations, making them more centralised. Despite these moves, some commentators argue that it was luck that played in deciding role in BP’s survival, such as Louise Cooper, markets analyst with BCG Partners, who said, “BP should be thankful that the spill occurred when the oil price was so high. The price of crude has ranged between $80 and $110 [a barrel] over the last few years, providing a massive profit windfall for the oil majors. This high oil price has enabled BP to survive the oil spill. Without such a high price, BP may well have been forced into bankruptcy.”
Bob has restored BP’s dividend, which at one point represented in £1 in every £6 paid out in dividends in the UK, but at a more sustainable level. In February 2012, Bob announced that he was able to increase the dividend by 14%, citing an increase in production of 170,000 barrels a day in the fourth quarter as evidence that BP had “turned the corner”:
“We are a smaller company now. We have sold more than £20bn of assets and we have provisioned for ... the expenses of the clean-up as well as the claims – nearly $40bn. So the idea of getting things back to where we were before is slightly unrealistic, I think. That does not mean that the value of the company will not return. We re-established the dividend a year ago at half the level it had been. Then we made the decision, not lightly, to increase it by 14%... The level of dividends we had before was at a level that prevented us from re-investing in the firm in an optimal way... Our shareholders are broadly satisfied with the idea that dividends will increase over time and that they should not expect it to get back to that level [of the past].”
Latest News
Away from work
Bob’s response the Mexican gulf crisis has defined his leadership style: “People realise we are serious. I believe that you cannot come out of an accident like this without a sense of responsibility to change.”
In a keynote address on ‘Redefining Global Leadership’ at Thunderbird School Of Global Management in 2011, where Bob was a masters student, he claimed that he had led BP above and beyond its legal obligations: “We all talk in business about corporate responsibility. But I believe this was corporate responsibility at a whole new level. The first and biggest decision we had to make was not to hide behind the laws in the US, but to step up and respond… We could have legally have restricted our liability to $75m, the liability cap laid out in the US Oil Pollution Act. In addition to stepping up and compensating those affected and helping clean up the spill, we also made voluntary contributions way beyond the law required.”
Bob said that the crisis demanded three main leadership qualities – attitude, relationships and management actions. While being sensitive to people’s emotions, he said that, “you need to have a thick skin. You have to ignore the noise and you can’t dwell on the constant public criticism that usually occurs in such a crisis. And even when under fire, you need a quiet sense of optimism, especially as a leader. That comes from having a clear direction and knowing that you are doing the right thing.”
Global leaders also must develop productive relationships, Bob said, “which means getting everyone to “row in the same direction… This does not mean you’re all the same or that you have the same viewpoints. But everybody has got to have a level of trust. Otherwise it is very hard to move things forward.” Bob added that global leaders must become masters of communication, especially in times of crisis: “A leader must communicate, communicate, communicate.” Good communication is not just about talking, but, “listening to ‘the quietest voice in the room’ – the person who doesn’t push themselves forward but who may have something unique to contribute. Our leaders are trained to pick up what can be described as ‘weak signals’ from the organisation.” This is particularly important in risk management.
While Bob is focused on the long-term and creating sustainable value for shareholders, customers and community, he cautions that engagement with the policy framework should be conducted at a professional distance: “We make big, long-term bets that sometimes do not produce revenue for a decade. We have to think about developing a work force and a sustainable investment that can live — in some cases — through multiple changes of government. The only way you can do that is to step back and try not to get yourself too deeply involved in the politics of a country.”
Finally, Bob argued that, as well as the right values, the business leaders of the future will need, “determination, sensitivity, decision-making under pressure… Things will not always be clear. You need to be comfortable with ambiguity and be flexible and patient – always with your eyes on the road ahead.”